Google Updated Associate-Cloud-Engineer Exam Questions and Answers by selina

According to the Google Cloud documentation, you can use organization policy constraints to control the creation and expiration of service account keys. The constraints are:

constraints/iam.allowServiceAccountKeyCreation: This constraint allows you to specify which projects or folders can create service account keys. You can set the value to true or false, or use a condition to apply the constraint to specific service accounts. By setting this constraint to false for the organization and adding an exception for the pj-sa project, you can prevent developers from creating service account keys in other projects.

constraints/iam.serviceAccountKeyMaxLifetime: This constraint allows you to specify the maximum lifetime of service account keys. You can set the value to a duration in seconds, such as 86400 for one day. By setting this constraint to 86400 for the organization, you can ensure that all service account keys expire after one day.

These constraints are recommended by Google Cloud as best practices to minimize the risk of service account key misuse or compromise. They also help you reduce the cost of managing service account keys, as you do not need to implement a custom solution to rotate or delete them.

Comprehensive and Detailed In Depth Explanation:

The key requirement is to migrate applications that rely on hard-coded internal IP addresses without modifying the application code. To achieve this, the migrated VMs in Google Cloud need to retain their original internal IP addresses.

A. Non-overlapping CIDR ranges and new static IPs: This option requires changing the IP addresses of the migrated workloads, which would necessitate modifying the application code to reflect these new addresses. This violates a core requirement.

B. Migrating DNS and using ephemeral IPs: While migrating DNS can be beneficial in the long run, using ephemeral internal IP addresses for the migrated workloads means their IPs could change upon restart, breaking the hard-coded IP address dependencies.

C. Single subnet with Cloud NAT and static NAT IP: Cloud NAT allows instances without external IP addresses to access the internet, but it doesn't help in preserving the internal IP addresses that the applications use to communicate with each other. The internal IP addresses of the VMs would still be within the VPC subnet range and might conflict if they are the same as the on-premises IPs.

D. Same CIDR ranges and same static IPs: Creating a VPC with the same CIDR ranges as the on-premises network and assigning the same static internal IP addresses to the migrated workloads is the only way to ensure that the applications can continue to communicate using their hard-coded IP addresses without any code changes. This approach effectively extends the on-premises network's IP address space into Google Cloud (though without direct connectivity initially, as stated in the problem). Once the workloads are migrated, future steps can involve establishing connectivity (e.g., using VPN or Interconnect) if needed for hybrid scenarios.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

VPC Network Overview: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/vpc - This document explains the fundamentals of VPC networks and their IP addressing. While it doesn't explicitly detail lift-and-shift scenarios with identical IP ranges without connectivity, it lays the groundwork for understanding VPC configuration.

Considerations for planning IP address ranges: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/subnets#ip-ranges - This section discusses IP address planning, and while overlapping ranges are generally discouraged for connected networks, for isolated migration scenarios as described, it's a necessary step to avoid application changes. The problem statement explicitly says the environments are not connected during the initial migration.

===========