Amazon Web Services transcender aws Certified Professional Dop-c02 Exam Questions And Answers Pdf by Rehmat q8 vce pdf

Page: 19 / 31

Exam Name:	AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional
Exam Code:	DOP-C02 Dumps
Vendor:	Amazon Web Services	Certification:	AWS Certified Professional
Questions:	425 Q&A's	Shared By:	rehmat

Question 76

A company has an organization in AWS Organizations for its multi-account environment. A DevOps engineer is developing an AWS CodeArtifact based strategy for application package management across the organization. Each application team at the company has its own account in the organization. Each application team also has limited access to a centralized shared services account.

Each application team needs full access to download, publish, and grant access to its own packages. Some common library packages that the application teams use must also be shared with the entire organization.

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST administrative overhead? (Select THREE.)

Options:

Create a domain in each application team ' s account. Grant each application team ' s account lull read access and write access to the application team ' s domain

Create a domain in the shared services account Grant the organization read access and CreateRepository access.

Create a repository in each application team ' s account. Grant each application team ' s account lull read access and write access to its own repository.

Create a repository in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access to the repository in the shared services account. Set the repository as the upstream repository in each application team ' s repository.

For teams that require shared packages, create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repository from other application teams ' accounts.

Set the other application teams ' repositories as upstream repositories.

Discussion

Answer:

B, D, E

Explanation:

 Step 1: Creating a Centralized Domain in the Shared Services Account

To manage application package dependencies across multiple accounts, the most efficient solution is to create a centralized domain in the shared services account. This allows all application teams to access and manage package repositories within the same domain, ensuring consistency and centralization.

Action: Create a domain in the shared services account.

Why: A single, centralized domain reduces the need for redundant management in each application team ' s account.

[Reference: AWS documentation on AWS CodeArtifact domains and repositories., This corresponds to Option B: Create a domain in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access and CreateRepository access.,  Step 2: Sharing Repositories Across Teams with Upstream ConfigurationsTo share common library packages across the organization, each application team's repository can point to the shared services repository as an upstream repository. This enables teams to access shared packages without managing them individually in each team's account., Action: Create a repository in the shared services account and set it as the upstream repository for each application team., Why: Upstream repositories allow package sharing while maintaining individual team repositories for managing their own packages., Reference: AWS documentation on Upstream repositories in CodeArtifact., This corresponds to Option D: Create a repository in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access to the repository in the shared services account. Set the repository as the upstream repository in each application team's repository.,  Step 3: Using Resource-Based Policies for Cross-Account AccessFor teams that need to share their packages with other application teams, resource-based policies can be applied to grant the necessary permissions. These policies allow cross-account access without having to manage permissions at the individual account level., Action: Create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repositories across application teams., Why: This simplifies management by centralizing permissions in the shared services account while allowing cross-team collaboration., Reference: AWS documentation on CodeArtifact resource-based policies., This corresponds to Option E: For teams that require shared packages, create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repository from other application teams' accounts., , , , ]

Question 77

A company uses Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) for all images of the company ' s containerized infrastructure. The company uses the pull through cache functionality with the /external prefix to avoid throttling when the company retrieves images from external image registries. The company uses AWS Organizations for its accounts.

Every image in the registry must be encrypted with a specific, pre-provisioned AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key. The company ' s internally created images already comply with this policy. However, cached external images use server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3).

The company must remove the noncompliant cache repositories. The company must also implement a secure solution to ensure that all new pull through cache repositories are automatically encrypted with the required KMS key.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Configure AWS Config. Add a custom rule that uses Guard syntax. Write the rule to enable KMS encryption for new repositories.

Configure an ECR repository creation template for the prefix. Specify the KMS key. Wait for the repositories to repopulate.

Configure an SCP for all AWS accounts that requires all ECR repositories to be KMS encrypted.

Create a new Amazon EventBridge rule that triggers on all " ECR Pull Through Cache Action " events. Set AWS KMS as the rule target.

Discussion

Question 78

A company is developing a web application ' s infrastructure using AWS CloudFormation The database engineering team maintains the database resources in a Cloud Formation template, and the software development team maintains the web application resources in a separate CloudFormation template. As the scope of the application grows, the software development team needs to use resources maintained by the database engineering team However, both teams have their own review and lifecycle management processes that they want to keep. Both teams also require resource-level change-set reviews. The software development team would like to deploy changes to this template using their Cl/CD pipeline.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create a stack export from the database CloudFormation template and import those references into the web application CloudFormation template

Create a CloudFormation nested stack to make cross-stack resource references and parameters available in both stacks.

Create a CloudFormation stack set to make cross-stack resource references and parameters available in both stacks.

Create input parameters in the web application CloudFormation template and pass resource names and IDs from the database stack.

Discussion

Zayaan

Successfully aced the exam… Thanks a lot for providing amazing Exam Dumps.

Harmony Mar 7, 2026

That's fantastic! I'm glad to hear that their dumps helped you. I also used them and found it accurate.

Cecilia

Yes, I passed my certification exam using Cramkey Dumps.

Helena Mar 9, 2026

Great. Yes they are really effective

Ace

No problem! I highly recommend Cramkey Dumps to anyone looking to pass their certification exams. They will help you feel confident and prepared on exam day. Good luck!

Harris Mar 12, 2026

That sounds amazing. I'll definitely check them out. Thanks for the recommendation!

Peyton

Hey guys. Guess what? I passed my exam. Thanks a lot Cramkey, your provided information was relevant and reliable.

Coby Mar 27, 2026

Thanks for sharing your experience. I think I'll give Cramkey a try for my next exam.

Question 79

A developer is maintaining a fleet of 50 Amazon EC2 Linux servers. The servers are part of an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group, and also use Elastic Load Balancing for load balancing.

Occasionally, some application servers are being terminated after failing ELB HTTP health checks. The developer would like to perform a root cause analysis on the issue, but before being able to access application logs, the server is terminated.

How can log collection be automated?

Options:

Use Auto Scaling lifecycle hooks to put instances in a Pending:Wait state. Create an Amazon CloudWatch alarm for EC2 Instance Terminate Successful and trigger an AWS Lambda function that invokes an SSM Run Command script to collect logs, push them to Amazon S3, and complete the lifecycle action once logs are collected.

Use Auto Scaling lifecycle hooks to put instances in a Terminating:Wait state. Create an AWS Config rule for EC2 Instance-terminate Lifecycle Action and trigger a step function that invokes a script to collect logs, push them to Amazon S3, and complete the lifecycle action once logs are collected.

Use Auto Scaling lifecycle hooks to put instances in a Terminating:Wait state. Create an Amazon CloudWatch subscription filter for EC2 Instance Terminate Successful and trigger a CloudWatch agent that invokes a script to collect logs, push them to Amazon S3, and complete the lifecycle action once logs are collected.

Use Auto Scaling lifecycle hooks to put instances in a Terminating:Wait state. Create an Amazon EventBridge rule for EC2 Instance-terminate Lifecycle Action and trigger an AWS Lambda function that invokes an SSM Run Command script to collect logs, push them to Amazon S3, and complete the lifecycle action once logs are collected.