Adobe Updated AD0-E902 Exam Questions and Answers by regan

Object ID in CRUD Operations:REST APIs commonly use CRUD operations to interact with resources. TheObject IDserves as a unique identifier for the resource and is generally required for the following actions:

A. Update:

To update a specific resource, the API must know which resource to modify. The Object ID is used to identify the exact resource that should be updated.

Example: A PUT or PATCH request typically requires the Object ID in the URL or body of the request.

URL Example:

PUT /tasks/{id}

B. Delete:

Similarly, when deleting a specific resource, the Object ID is needed to ensure the correct resource is removed.

Example: A DELETE request requires the Object ID in the URL to target the specific resource.

URL Example:

DELETE /tasks/{id}

Why Not Other Options?

C. Respond: This is not a standard CRUD operation in REST APIs and does not involve an Object ID.

D. Create: The Create operation (typically POST) does not require an Object ID because the resource does not yet exist. Instead, the API usually generates the Object ID after creation.

References:

REST API Documentation Best Practices: CRUD Operations

Experience League: Understanding CRUD in Workfront APIs

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Error:

The error message [403] The caller does not have permission is aGoogle API permission error.

It typically indicates that the user or application does not have the required access rights to perform the requested action on the Google Slide presentation.

Option Analysis:

A. Reauthorize their Google connection:

This step might be necessary if the user's credentials or token have expired, but this is not the primary issue here since the error specifically states apermission problem.

B. Update Google sharing permissions for the document:

Correct. The error suggests that the Google Slide document has not been shared with the user or service account being used in Fusion. Updating the sharing settings to grant proper permissions (e.g., "Editor" or "Viewer" access) will resolve the issue.

C. Contact Workfront Support to troubleshoot the root cause:

While Workfront Support can help with Fusion-related issues, this error originates from Google and is unrelated to Workfront's systems.

D. Search the Google status site to determine the cause:

The Google status site is useful for identifying system-wide outages, but this is a user-specific permission issue, not a Google platform-wide problem.

Steps to Resolve:

Open the Google Slide presentation.

Update the sharing permissions:

Grant access to the Google account or service account being used in Fusion.

Ensure the account has at leastEditoror appropriate access rights.

Save the changes and rerun the Fusion scenario.

Why Updating Permissions is Best:

This action directly addresses the root cause of the error, which is inadequate access rights.

Once permissions are updated, Fusion will be able to connect to and manipulate the Google Slide document as intended.

References:The [403] The caller does not have permission error is documented in Google API troubleshooting guides, which recommend verifying and updating document sharing settings for resolving access issues.

A. Expected Outcome of Test

A test case must clearly state what the expected outcome is, providing a standard against which the results can be measured.

This ensures testers can validate whether the scenario behaves as intended.

C. Clear Procedure for Completing the Test

A well-defined procedure outlines the exact steps required to execute the test, ensuring consistent and repeatable testing.

This reduces ambiguity and helps identify whether errors are due to the scenario configuration or improper test execution.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Name of Test Owner: While helpful for accountability, the name of the test owner is not a required component of the test case itself.

D. Source Code Being Tested: Fusion scenarios do not typically involve source code. Instead, the focus is on workflow execution and configuration, making this element irrelevant.

References:

Workfront Training Materials: Test Case Design Best Practices

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Testing and Debugging Scenarios

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Problem Summary:

The scenario has become too large due to the high number of modules.

The goal is to reduce the number of modules by optimizing how data is transformed.

Option Analysis:

A. Nesting multiple mapping panel functions:

Nesting multiple functions in the mapping panel (e.g., using if(), concat(), replace()) eliminates the need for separate modules to set and reset variables for each transformation.

This is a highly efficient technique to transform data in fewer modules, making it the correct answer.

B. Using a Compose a string module and Text Parser:

This involves additional modules (Compose a string + Text Parser) instead of reducing the number of modules. It is not an optimal solution to this problem.

C. Setting the scenario to Auto Commit:

The Auto Commit setting helps with transactional control and does not reduce the number of modules in a scenario.

Why Nesting Mapping Functions is Effective:

Efficiency: Complex transformations can be performed inline within a single mapping panel.

Readability: Proper nesting and naming conventions make it easier to understand the logic without adding unnecessary modules.

Scalability: This approach keeps the scenario compact and reduces complexity as the scenario grows.

How to Implement:

Open the mapping panel in relevant modules.

Use multiple nested functions like if(), concat(), add(), etc., within the mapping expressions.

Test the mapping thoroughly to ensure correctness.